<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Explaining Social Media Optimization to the Uninformed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wardontheweb.com/explaining-social-media-optimization-to-the-uninformed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wardontheweb.com/explaining-social-media-optimization-to-the-uninformed/</link>
	<description>Valuable Insights for Better Websites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:57:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Explaining Blogs to the Uninformed : Ward on the Web</title>
		<link>http://www.wardontheweb.com/explaining-social-media-optimization-to-the-uninformed/comment-page-1/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Explaining Blogs to the Uninformed : Ward on the Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 12:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wardontheweb.com/?p=155#comment-351</guid>
		<description>[...] like social media optimization, it can be difficult to convey the value of blogging to the uninformed. I&#8217;ve had to convince [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] like social media optimization, it can be difficult to convey the value of blogging to the uninformed. I&#8217;ve had to convince [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Ward</title>
		<link>http://www.wardontheweb.com/explaining-social-media-optimization-to-the-uninformed/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wardontheweb.com/?p=155#comment-182</guid>
		<description>I totally agree.  Spam is bad, and social media spam is the worst.  However, I&#039;d argue that social media optimization, done correctly, is never spam.  Sure, there&#039;s a commercial interest motivating it, but a properly-optimized article will still be valuable and linkable.

Much like SEO, those who work against the system will suffer, while those who work with the system will benefit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree.  Spam is bad, and social media spam is the worst.  However, I&#8217;d argue that social media optimization, done correctly, is never spam.  Sure, there&#8217;s a commercial interest motivating it, but a properly-optimized article will still be valuable and linkable.</p>
<p>Much like SEO, those who work against the system will suffer, while those who work with the system will benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Owens</title>
		<link>http://www.wardontheweb.com/explaining-social-media-optimization-to-the-uninformed/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Owens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wardontheweb.com/?p=155#comment-181</guid>
		<description>Companies that spam digg, reddit, etc... are the worst. It&#039;s the scattershoot approach, and rarely works unless you have a power digger behind you. And Digg has redesigned its site recently so that you get even less SEO benefit from it now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Companies that spam digg, reddit, etc&#8230; are the worst. It&#8217;s the scattershoot approach, and rarely works unless you have a power digger behind you. And Digg has redesigned its site recently so that you get even less SEO benefit from it now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

